Lunalytics vs Cloudprober
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Lunalytics
Simple self-hosted website and service uptime monitor
VS
Cloudprober
Active probing for distributed systems and network reliability
| Feature | Lunalytics | Cloudprober |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | CSS | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1 | ★ 694 |
| First released | 2023 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Pingdom, Better Uptime | Pingdom, Catchpoint |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Lunalytics or Cloudprober better?
Neither is universally better. Cloudprober has the larger community, while Lunalytics is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Lunalytics and Cloudprober free and open-source?
Yes. Lunalytics is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Cloudprober under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Lunalytics and Cloudprober with Docker?
Lunalytics: yes. Cloudprober: yes.