CKAN vs Docker Volume Backup
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
CKAN
Make open data websites
VS
Docker Volume Backup
Backup tool for Docker volumes to local or remote storage
| Feature | CKAN | Docker Volume Backup |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,088 | ★ 3,944 |
| First released | 2026 | 2021 |
| Replaces | — | Veeam |
Why pick each one
Choose CKAN if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Docker Volume Backup if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.9k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is CKAN or Docker Volume Backup better?
Neither is universally better. CKAN has the larger community, while Docker Volume Backup is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are CKAN and Docker Volume Backup free and open-source?
Yes. CKAN is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Docker Volume Backup under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run CKAN and Docker Volume Backup with Docker?
CKAN: check the project docs for container support. Docker Volume Backup: yes.