Chromium vs mitmproxy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Chromium
The open-source browser project
VS
mitmproxy
Interactive HTTPS proxy for inspection and debugging
| Feature | Chromium | mitmproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | free | MIT |
| Language | Dockerfile | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, one-click | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 384 | ★ 44,605 |
| First released | 2022 | 2010 |
| Replaces | — | Charles Proxy, Fiddler |
Why pick each one
Choose Chromium if…
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- One-click install on common self-host platforms
- Written in Dockerfile
Frequently asked questions
Is Chromium or mitmproxy better?
Neither is universally better. mitmproxy has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Chromium and mitmproxy free and open-source?
Yes. Chromium is licensed under free and mitmproxy under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Chromium and mitmproxy with Docker?
Chromium: yes. mitmproxy: yes.