Candy vs Chatwoot

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCandyChatwoot
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageJavaScriptRuby
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM32 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcedocker, kubernetes, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 1,314★ 35,596
First released20112019
ReplacesChatangoIntercom, Zendesk, Drift

Why pick each one

Choose Candy if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
Candy details

Choose Chatwoot if…

  • Polished customer support workflow
  • Active development
Chatwoot details

Frequently asked questions

Is Candy or Chatwoot better?

Neither is universally better. Chatwoot has the larger community, while Candy is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Candy and Chatwoot free and open-source?

Yes. Candy is licensed under MIT and Chatwoot under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Candy and Chatwoot with Docker?

Candy: check the project docs for container support. Chatwoot: yes.

Related comparisons