Burp vs Backup tool nono Plakar
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Burp
Network backup and restore program for Unix and Windows
VS
Backup tool nono Plakar
Effortless backup with built-in verification and UI
| Feature | Burp | Backup tool nono Plakar |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | ISC |
| Language | C | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 504 | ★ 2,013 |
| First released | 2011 | 2021 |
| Replaces | CrashPlan | Backblaze, CrashPlan |
Why pick each one
Choose Burp if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose Backup tool nono Plakar if…
- Released under the ISC license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Burp or Backup tool nono Plakar better?
Backup tool nono Plakar is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Burp if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Burp and Backup tool nono Plakar free and open-source?
Yes. Burp is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Backup tool nono Plakar under ISC. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Burp and Backup tool nono Plakar with Docker?
Burp: check the project docs for container support. Backup tool nono Plakar: yes.