Bugzilla vs Peppermint
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted helpdesk & ticketing options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Bugzilla
Time-tested bug tracking system from Mozilla
VS
Peppermint
Open-source ticket management and helpdesk
| Feature | Bugzilla | Peppermint |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Helpdesk & Ticketing | Helpdesk & Ticketing |
| License | MPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Perl | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 850 | ★ 3,159 |
| First released | 1998 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Jira | Zendesk, Jira Service Management |
Why pick each one
Choose Bugzilla if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- Written in Perl
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Peppermint if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Bugzilla or Peppermint better?
Peppermint is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Bugzilla if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Bugzilla and Peppermint free and open-source?
Yes. Bugzilla is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Peppermint under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Bugzilla and Peppermint with Docker?
Bugzilla: check the project docs for container support. Peppermint: yes.