SHSelfHostIndex

BrowserQuest vs Battle for Wesnoth

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
BR BrowserQuest Self-hostable HTML5 multiplayer adventure game VS BA Battle for Wesnoth Turn-based fantasy strategy with multiplayer server
FeatureBrowserQuestBattle for Wesnoth
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseMPL-2.0GPL-2.0
LanguageJavaScriptC++
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbare-metal, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 9,378★ 6,814
First released20122003
ReplacesRealm of the Mad GodHeroes of Might and Magic

Why pick each one

Choose BrowserQuest if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 9.4k GitHub stars
BrowserQuest details

Choose Battle for Wesnoth if…

  • Lightweight headless server
  • Huge content add-on library
Battle for Wesnoth details

Frequently asked questions

Is BrowserQuest or Battle for Wesnoth better?

Neither is universally better. BrowserQuest has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are BrowserQuest and Battle for Wesnoth free and open-source?

Yes. BrowserQuest is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Battle for Wesnoth under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run BrowserQuest and Battle for Wesnoth with Docker?

BrowserQuest: yes. Battle for Wesnoth: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons