AzerothCore vs BrowserQuest

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAzerothCoreBrowserQuest
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseAGPL-3.0MPL-2.0
LanguageC++JavaScript
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM4,096 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 8,732★ 9,378
First released20172012
Replacesofficial WoW serversRealm of the Mad God

Why pick each one

Choose AzerothCore if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 8.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
AzerothCore details

Choose BrowserQuest if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 9.4k GitHub stars
BrowserQuest details

Frequently asked questions

Is AzerothCore or BrowserQuest better?

BrowserQuest is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider AzerothCore if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are AzerothCore and BrowserQuest free and open-source?

Yes. AzerothCore is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and BrowserQuest under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run AzerothCore and BrowserQuest with Docker?

AzerothCore: yes. BrowserQuest: yes.

Related comparisons