BrowserQuest vs Colyseus

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBrowserQuestColyseus
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseMPL-2.0MIT
LanguageJavaScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 9,378★ 7,168
First released20122016
ReplacesRealm of the Mad GodPhoton Engine

Why pick each one

Choose BrowserQuest if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 9.4k GitHub stars
BrowserQuest details

Choose Colyseus if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 7.2k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Colyseus details

Frequently asked questions

Is BrowserQuest or Colyseus better?

BrowserQuest is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Colyseus if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are BrowserQuest and Colyseus free and open-source?

Yes. BrowserQuest is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Colyseus under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run BrowserQuest and Colyseus with Docker?

BrowserQuest: yes. Colyseus: yes.

Related comparisons