BrowserQuest vs Nakama

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBrowserQuestNakama
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseMPL-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageJavaScriptGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 9,378★ 13,121
First released20122017
ReplacesRealm of the Mad GodPlayFab, Firebase

Why pick each one

Choose BrowserQuest if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 9.4k GitHub stars
BrowserQuest details

Choose Nakama if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 13.1k GitHub stars
Nakama details

Frequently asked questions

Is BrowserQuest or Nakama better?

Neither is universally better. Nakama has the larger community, while BrowserQuest is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are BrowserQuest and Nakama free and open-source?

Yes. BrowserQuest is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Nakama under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run BrowserQuest and Nakama with Docker?

BrowserQuest: yes. Nakama: yes.

Related comparisons