AzerothCore vs Nakama

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAzerothCoreNakama
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageC++Go
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM4,096 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 8,732★ 13,121
First released20172017
Replacesofficial WoW serversPlayFab, Firebase

Why pick each one

Choose AzerothCore if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 8.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
AzerothCore details

Choose Nakama if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 13.1k GitHub stars
Nakama details

Frequently asked questions

Is AzerothCore or Nakama better?

Nakama is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider AzerothCore if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are AzerothCore and Nakama free and open-source?

Yes. AzerothCore is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Nakama under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run AzerothCore and Nakama with Docker?

AzerothCore: yes. Nakama: yes.

Related comparisons