Berty vs WorkAdventure

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBertyWorkAdventure
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 9,268★ 5,696
First released20182026
ReplacesWhatsApp, Signal

Why pick each one

Choose Berty if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Mature project with 9.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Berty details

Choose WorkAdventure if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 5.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
WorkAdventure details

Frequently asked questions

Is Berty or WorkAdventure better?

Neither is universally better. Berty has the larger community, while WorkAdventure is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Berty and WorkAdventure free and open-source?

Yes. Berty is licensed under Apache-2.0 and WorkAdventure under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Berty and WorkAdventure with Docker?

Berty: check the project docs for container support. WorkAdventure: yes.

Related comparisons