Asterisk vs WorkAdventure
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Asterisk
Open-source framework for building telephony systems
VS
WorkAdventure
Virtual office / virtual conference application presented as a 16-bit
| Feature | Asterisk | WorkAdventure |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | C | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,431 | ★ 5,696 |
| First released | 1999 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Avaya, Cisco Unified Communications | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Asterisk if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in C
Choose WorkAdventure if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 5.7k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Asterisk or WorkAdventure better?
WorkAdventure is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Asterisk if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Asterisk and WorkAdventure free and open-source?
Yes. Asterisk is licensed under GPL-2.0 and WorkAdventure under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Asterisk and WorkAdventure with Docker?
Asterisk: yes. WorkAdventure: yes.