Berty vs FreeScout

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBertyFreeScout
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptPHP
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM256 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 9,268★ 4,465
First released20182018
ReplacesWhatsApp, SignalHelp Scout, Zendesk, Front

Why pick each one

Choose Berty if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Mature project with 9.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Berty details

Choose FreeScout if…

  • Truly free and self-hosted
  • Low resource needs
FreeScout details

Frequently asked questions

Is Berty or FreeScout better?

Neither is universally better. Berty has the larger community, while FreeScout is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Berty and FreeScout free and open-source?

Yes. Berty is licensed under Apache-2.0 and FreeScout under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Berty and FreeScout with Docker?

Berty: check the project docs for container support. FreeScout: yes.

Related comparisons