beelzebub vs mitmproxy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
beelzebub
Honeypot framework designed to provide a highly secure environment for
VS
mitmproxy
Interactive HTTPS proxy for inspection and debugging
| Feature | beelzebub | mitmproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,134 | ★ 44,605 |
| First released | 2026 | 2010 |
| Replaces | — | Charles Proxy, Fiddler |
Why pick each one
Choose beelzebub if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (2.1k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is beelzebub or mitmproxy better?
mitmproxy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider beelzebub if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are beelzebub and mitmproxy free and open-source?
Yes. beelzebub is licensed under MIT and mitmproxy under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run beelzebub and mitmproxy with Docker?
beelzebub: yes. mitmproxy: yes.