Antora vs Gollum
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted wikis & documentation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Antora
Multi-repository documentation site generator
VS
Gollum
A simple, Git-powered wiki with a sweet API
| Feature | Antora | Gollum |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Wikis & Documentation | Wikis & Documentation |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | binary, docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 800 | ★ 14,308 |
| First released | 2017 | 2010 |
| Replaces | Confluence, GitBook | Confluence, Notion |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Antora or Gollum better?
Neither is universally better. Gollum has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Antora and Gollum free and open-source?
Yes. Antora is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Gollum under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Antora and Gollum with Docker?
Antora: check the project docs for container support. Gollum: yes.