Django Wiki vs Gollum
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted wikis & documentation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Django Wiki
Wiki application for the Django web framework
VS
Gollum
A simple, Git-powered wiki with a sweet API
| Feature | Django Wiki | Gollum |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Wikis & Documentation | Wikis & Documentation |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source, docker | binary, docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,930 | ★ 14,308 |
| First released | 2013 | 2010 |
| Replaces | Confluence, MediaWiki | Confluence, Notion |
Why pick each one
Choose Django Wiki if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Django Wiki or Gollum better?
Neither is universally better. Gollum has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Django Wiki and Gollum free and open-source?
Yes. Django Wiki is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Gollum under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Django Wiki and Gollum with Docker?
Django Wiki: yes. Gollum: yes.