WG-Easy vs WireGuard Portal
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
WG-Easy
The easiest way to run WireGuard VPN with a web UI
VS
WireGuard Portal
Web-based configuration portal for WireGuard
| Feature | WG-Easy | WireGuard Portal |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 26,595 | ★ 1,791 |
| First released | 2021 | 2020 |
| Replaces | OpenVPN Access Server | OpenVPN Access Server |
Why pick each one
Choose WireGuard Portal if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is WG-Easy or WireGuard Portal better?
WG-Easy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider WireGuard Portal if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are WG-Easy and WireGuard Portal free and open-source?
Yes. WG-Easy is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and WireGuard Portal under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run WG-Easy and WireGuard Portal with Docker?
WG-Easy: yes. WireGuard Portal: yes.