Defguard vs WireGuard Portal

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDefguardWireGuard Portal
CategoryRemote Access & VPNRemote Access & VPN
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageRustGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 2,798★ 1,791
First released20232020
ReplacesOpenVPN Access Server, TwingateOpenVPN Access Server

Why pick each one

Choose Defguard if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Rust
Defguard details

Choose WireGuard Portal if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
WireGuard Portal details

Frequently asked questions

Is Defguard or WireGuard Portal better?

Neither is universally better. Defguard has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Defguard and WireGuard Portal free and open-source?

Yes. Defguard is licensed under Apache-2.0 and WireGuard Portal under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Defguard and WireGuard Portal with Docker?

Defguard: yes. WireGuard Portal: yes.

Related comparisons