Wallabag vs Shiori
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted bookmarks & read-it-later options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Wallabag | Shiori |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | PHP | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 12,884 | ★ 11,574 |
| First released | 2013 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Pocket, Instapaper | Pocket, Raindrop.io |
Why pick each one
Choose Wallabag if…
- Great read-it-later experience
- Own your reading list
- Apps available
Choose Shiori if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 11.6k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Wallabag or Shiori better?
Neither is universally better. Wallabag has the larger community, while Shiori is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Wallabag and Shiori free and open-source?
Yes. Wallabag is licensed under MIT and Shiori under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Wallabag and Shiori with Docker?
Wallabag: yes. Shiori: yes.