Docker Volume Backup vs pgBackWeb
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Docker Volume Backup
Backup tool for Docker volumes to local or remote storage
VS
pgBackWeb
Web interface for scheduling PostgreSQL backups
| Feature | Docker Volume Backup | pgBackWeb |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,944 | ★ 2,615 |
| First released | 2021 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Veeam | AWS RDS Backups |
Why pick each one
Choose Docker Volume Backup if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.9k GitHub stars)
Choose pgBackWeb if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.6k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Docker Volume Backup or pgBackWeb better?
Neither is universally better. Docker Volume Backup has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Docker Volume Backup and pgBackWeb free and open-source?
Yes. Docker Volume Backup is licensed under MPL-2.0 and pgBackWeb under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Docker Volume Backup and pgBackWeb with Docker?
Docker Volume Backup: yes. pgBackWeb: yes.