Virtual TimeClock vs Wakapi
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Virtual TimeClock
Powerful, easy-to-use time tracking software
VS
Wakapi
Self-hosted coding activity and time tracking server
| Feature | Virtual TimeClock | Wakapi |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Time Tracking | Time Tracking |
| License | ⊘ Proprietary | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Unknown | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | — | ★ 4,398 |
| First released | 2020 | 2019 |
| Replaces | — | WakaTime, RescueTime |
Why pick each one
Choose Virtual TimeClock if…
- Released under the ⊘ Proprietary license
- Written in Unknown
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Wakapi if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.4k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Virtual TimeClock or Wakapi better?
Wakapi is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Virtual TimeClock if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Virtual TimeClock and Wakapi free and open-source?
Yes. Virtual TimeClock is licensed under ⊘ Proprietary and Wakapi under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Virtual TimeClock and Wakapi with Docker?
Virtual TimeClock: check the project docs for container support. Wakapi: yes.