Anuko Time Tracker vs Wakapi
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Anuko Time Tracker
Simple multi-user web time tracking system
VS
Wakapi
Self-hosted coding activity and time tracking server
| Feature | Anuko Time Tracker | Wakapi |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Time Tracking | Time Tracking |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 207 | ★ 4,398 |
| First released | 2003 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Clockify, Harvest | WakaTime, RescueTime |
Why pick each one
Choose Anuko Time Tracker if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose Wakapi if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.4k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Anuko Time Tracker or Wakapi better?
Neither is universally better. Wakapi has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Anuko Time Tracker and Wakapi free and open-source?
Yes. Anuko Time Tracker is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Wakapi under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Anuko Time Tracker and Wakapi with Docker?
Anuko Time Tracker: check the project docs for container support. Wakapi: yes.