tinysearch vs ZincSearch
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
tinysearch
Tiny WebAssembly-powered static site search
VS
ZincSearch
Lightweight search engine alternative to Elasticsearch
| Feature | tinysearch | ZincSearch |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Rust | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,953 | ★ 17,884 |
| First released | 2019 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Algolia | Elasticsearch, Algolia |
Why pick each one
Choose tinysearch if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Active community (3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is tinysearch or ZincSearch better?
ZincSearch is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider tinysearch if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are tinysearch and ZincSearch free and open-source?
Yes. tinysearch is licensed under MIT and ZincSearch under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run tinysearch and ZincSearch with Docker?
tinysearch: check the project docs for container support. ZincSearch: yes.