SHSelfHostIndex

timetrace vs Gnomecast Timewarrior UI

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
TI timetrace Simple command-line time tracker for projects VS GN Gnomecast Timewarrior UI Graphical front-end for the Timewarrior CLI tracker
FeaturetimetraceGnomecast Timewarrior UI
CategoryTime TrackingTime Tracking
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcebinary, source
GitHub stars★ 794★ 70
First released20212020
ReplacesClockify, TogglToggl Desktop, Clockify Desktop

Why pick each one

Choose timetrace if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
timetrace details

Choose Gnomecast Timewarrior UI if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Gnomecast Timewarrior UI details

Frequently asked questions

Is timetrace or Gnomecast Timewarrior UI better?

Neither is universally better. timetrace has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are timetrace and Gnomecast Timewarrior UI free and open-source?

Yes. timetrace is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Gnomecast Timewarrior UI under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run timetrace and Gnomecast Timewarrior UI with Docker?

timetrace: check the project docs for container support. Gnomecast Timewarrior UI: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons