SHSelfHostIndex

ActivityWatch vs Gnomecast Timewarrior UI

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
AC ActivityWatch Automatic, privacy-first time tracking for your devices VS GN Gnomecast Timewarrior UI Graphical front-end for the Timewarrior CLI tracker
FeatureActivityWatchGnomecast Timewarrior UI
CategoryTime TrackingTime Tracking
LicenseMPL-2.0MIT
LanguagePythonPython
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcebinary, source
GitHub stars★ 18,527★ 70
First released20162020
ReplacesRescueTime, ManicTimeToggl Desktop, Clockify Desktop

Why pick each one

Choose ActivityWatch if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 18.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
ActivityWatch details

Choose Gnomecast Timewarrior UI if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Gnomecast Timewarrior UI details

Frequently asked questions

Is ActivityWatch or Gnomecast Timewarrior UI better?

Neither is universally better. ActivityWatch has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are ActivityWatch and Gnomecast Timewarrior UI free and open-source?

Yes. ActivityWatch is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Gnomecast Timewarrior UI under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run ActivityWatch and Gnomecast Timewarrior UI with Docker?

ActivityWatch: check the project docs for container support. Gnomecast Timewarrior UI: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons