Timeshift vs pgBackWeb
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Timeshift
System restore tool for Linux using snapshots
VS
pgBackWeb
Web interface for scheduling PostgreSQL backups
| Feature | Timeshift | pgBackWeb |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Vala | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,219 | ★ 2,615 |
| First released | 2014 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Time Machine, System Restore | AWS RDS Backups |
Why pick each one
Choose Timeshift if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (4.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Vala
Choose pgBackWeb if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.6k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Timeshift or pgBackWeb better?
Neither is universally better. Timeshift has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Timeshift and pgBackWeb free and open-source?
Yes. Timeshift is licensed under GPL-3.0 and pgBackWeb under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Timeshift and pgBackWeb with Docker?
Timeshift: check the project docs for container support. pgBackWeb: yes.