TigerVNC vs x11vnc
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
TigerVNC
High-performance, platform-neutral VNC implementation
VS
x11vnc
VNC server for real X11 displays
| Feature | TigerVNC | x11vnc |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | C++ | C |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, binary | bare-metal, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,368 | ★ 846 |
| First released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Replaces | RealVNC | TightVNC, RealVNC |
Why pick each one
Choose TigerVNC if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Mature project with 7.4k GitHub stars
- Written in C++
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose x11vnc if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is TigerVNC or x11vnc better?
Neither is universally better. TigerVNC has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are TigerVNC and x11vnc free and open-source?
Yes. TigerVNC is licensed under GPL-2.0 and x11vnc under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run TigerVNC and x11vnc with Docker?
TigerVNC: check the project docs for container support. x11vnc: check the project docs for container support.