Thruk vs Uptime Kuma

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureThrukUptime Kuma
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseGPL-1.0MIT
LanguagePerlJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, docker, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 439★ 89,960
First released20092021
ReplacesSolarWindsPingdom, UptimeRobot

Why pick each one

Choose Thruk if…

  • Unifies many monitoring cores
  • Mature and stable
Thruk details

Choose Uptime Kuma if…

  • Very easy to use
  • Great notifications
  • Lightweight
Uptime Kuma details

Frequently asked questions

Is Thruk or Uptime Kuma better?

Uptime Kuma is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Thruk if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Thruk and Uptime Kuma free and open-source?

Yes. Thruk is licensed under GPL-1.0 and Uptime Kuma under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Thruk and Uptime Kuma with Docker?

Thruk: yes. Uptime Kuma: yes.

Related comparisons