Syncthing vs WebDAV Server Go
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Syncthing | WebDAV Server Go |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | ≈5-minute setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 100 · Excellent | 90 · Excellent |
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 88,884 | ★ 5,877 |
| First released | 2014 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Dropbox, Resilio Sync | Dropbox |
What are Syncthing and WebDAV Server Go?
Syncthing
Syncthing is a continuous file synchronization program that syncs files between two or more devices directly, without a central server. It is ideal for individuals who want private, serverless sync across their own machines. It is distributed as a single binary and also runs well in Docker.
- Fully decentralized peer-to-peer sync
- TLS-encrypted transfers
- No cloud account required
- Cross-platform with mobile apps
WebDAV Server Go
A lightweight standalone WebDAV server that exposes a directory tree for syncing with WebDAV-capable clients. It is useful as a minimal sync backend for many file managers and apps.
- Standalone WebDAV
- Per-user permissions
- Minimal backend
- Cross-platform clients
Syncthing vs WebDAV Server Go: key differences
Both projects are written in Go. Licensing differs — MPL-2.0 for Syncthing versus MIT for WebDAV Server Go. WebDAV Server Go is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 128 MB for Syncthing. Syncthing is the more established project (first released 2014), while WebDAV Server Go arrived in 2017. Syncthing has the considerably larger community, at 88,884 GitHub stars versus 5,877.
Why pick each one
Choose Syncthing if…
- No central server needed
- Very private by design
- Lightweight and reliable
Watch out for
- No web file browsing
- Not a sharing platform
Choose WebDAV Server Go if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 5.9k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Syncthing or WebDAV Server Go better?
Neither is universally better. Syncthing has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Syncthing and WebDAV Server Go free and open-source?
Yes. Syncthing is licensed under MPL-2.0 and WebDAV Server Go under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Syncthing and WebDAV Server Go with Docker?
Syncthing: yes. WebDAV Server Go: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Syncthing or WebDAV Server Go?
WebDAV Server Go has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 128 MB for Syncthing. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.
Related comparisons
- Syncthing vs Syncthing Android Wrapper
- WebDAV Server Go vs Syncthing Android Wrapper
- Syncthing vs closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin
- WebDAV Server Go vs closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin
- Syncthing vs copyparty
- WebDAV Server Go vs copyparty
- Syncthing vs Dufs
- WebDAV Server Go vs Dufs
- Syncthing vs File Browser
- WebDAV Server Go vs File Browser