Sanoid vs pgBackWeb
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Sanoid
Policy-driven ZFS snapshot management and replication
VS
pgBackWeb
Web interface for scheduling PostgreSQL backups
| Feature | Sanoid | pgBackWeb |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Perl | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,830 | ★ 2,615 |
| First released | 2014 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Time Machine | AWS RDS Backups |
Why pick each one
Choose Sanoid if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Perl
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose pgBackWeb if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.6k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Sanoid or pgBackWeb better?
Neither is universally better. Sanoid has the larger community, while pgBackWeb is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Sanoid and pgBackWeb free and open-source?
Yes. Sanoid is licensed under GPL-3.0 and pgBackWeb under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Sanoid and pgBackWeb with Docker?
Sanoid: check the project docs for container support. pgBackWeb: yes.