SyncMarks vs Omnivore

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted bookmarks & read-it-later options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSyncMarksOmnivore
CategoryBookmarks & Read-It-LaterBookmarks & Read-It-Later
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 16,211
First released20202022
ReplacesPocket, Instapaper

Why pick each one

Choose SyncMarks if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Written in PHP
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
SyncMarks details

Choose Omnivore if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 16.2k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Omnivore details

Frequently asked questions

Is SyncMarks or Omnivore better?

Neither is universally better. Omnivore has the larger community, while SyncMarks is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SyncMarks and Omnivore free and open-source?

Yes. SyncMarks is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Omnivore under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SyncMarks and Omnivore with Docker?

SyncMarks: check the project docs for container support. Omnivore: yes.

Related comparisons