Super Productivity vs Zammad

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSuper ProductivityZammad
CategoryProject Management & TasksChat & Communication
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptRuby
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB4,096 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 21,181★ 5,834
First released20182016
ReplacesTodoist, ThingsZendesk, Freshdesk

Why pick each one

Choose Super Productivity if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 21.2k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Super Productivity details

Choose Zammad if…

  • Mature support workflow
  • Good integrations
Zammad details

Frequently asked questions

Is Super Productivity or Zammad better?

Super Productivity is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Zammad if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Super Productivity and Zammad free and open-source?

Yes. Super Productivity is licensed under MIT and Zammad under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Super Productivity and Zammad with Docker?

Super Productivity: check the project docs for container support. Zammad: yes.

Related comparisons