SHSelfHostIndex

SuiteCRM vs Fat Free CRM

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted crm & business apps options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
SU SuiteCRM Award-winning open-source CRM application VS FA Fat Free CRM Ruby on Rails open-source customer relationship manager
FeatureSuiteCRMFat Free CRM
CategoryCRM & Business AppsCRM & Business Apps
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguagePHPRuby
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 5,637★ 3,628
First released20132008
ReplacesSalesforce, HubSpotSalesforce

Why pick each one

Choose SuiteCRM if…

  • Feature-complete CRM
  • Free and open source
  • Mature
SuiteCRM details

Choose Fat Free CRM if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.6k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Ruby
Fat Free CRM details

Frequently asked questions

Is SuiteCRM or Fat Free CRM better?

Neither is universally better. SuiteCRM has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are SuiteCRM and Fat Free CRM free and open-source?

Yes. SuiteCRM is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Fat Free CRM under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SuiteCRM and Fat Free CRM with Docker?

SuiteCRM: yes. Fat Free CRM: yes.

Related comparisons