Stash vs Universal Media Server
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Stash
Self-hosted media organizer and server
VS
Universal Media Server
DLNA-compliant media server for streaming to TVs and consoles
| Feature | Stash | Universal Media Server |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media Servers | Media Servers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 12,802 | ★ 2,636 |
| First released | 2019 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Plex | Plex, Serviio |
Why pick each one
Choose Universal Media Server if…
- Works with old TVs and consoles
- Simple setup
Frequently asked questions
Is Stash or Universal Media Server better?
Neither is universally better. Stash has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Stash and Universal Media Server free and open-source?
Yes. Stash is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Universal Media Server under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Stash and Universal Media Server with Docker?
Stash: yes. Universal Media Server: yes.