Dim vs Stash
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Dim
Self-hosted media manager with automatic library scanning
VS
Stash
Self-hosted media organizer and server
| Feature | Dim | Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media Servers | Media Servers |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Rust | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,099 | ★ 12,802 |
| First released | 2020 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Plex | Plex |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Dim or Stash better?
Stash is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Dim if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Dim and Stash free and open-source?
Yes. Dim is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Stash under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dim and Stash with Docker?
Dim: yes. Stash: yes.