SSHPiper vs Warpgate

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSSHPiperWarpgate
CategoryRemote Access & VPNRemote Access & VPN
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageGoRust
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM128 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 1,288★ 7,505
First released20152021
ReplacesTeleportTeleport

Why pick each one

Choose SSHPiper if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
SSHPiper details

Choose Warpgate if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 7.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Rust
Warpgate details

Frequently asked questions

Is SSHPiper or Warpgate better?

Neither is universally better. Warpgate has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are SSHPiper and Warpgate free and open-source?

Yes. SSHPiper is licensed under MIT and Warpgate under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SSHPiper and Warpgate with Docker?

SSHPiper: yes. Warpgate: yes.

Related comparisons