Next Terminal vs SSHPiper
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Next Terminal
Self-hosted SSH bastion with web terminal and audit
VS
SSHPiper
Reverse proxy router for SSH connections
| Feature | Next Terminal | SSHPiper |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,604 | ★ 1,288 |
| First released | 2020 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Apache Guacamole, Teleport | Teleport |
Why pick each one
Choose Next Terminal if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 5.6k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Choose SSHPiper if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Next Terminal or SSHPiper better?
Neither is universally better. Next Terminal has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Next Terminal and SSHPiper free and open-source?
Yes. Next Terminal is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SSHPiper under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Next Terminal and SSHPiper with Docker?
Next Terminal: yes. SSHPiper: yes.