Next Terminal vs SSHPiper

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNext TerminalSSHPiper
CategoryRemote Access & VPNRemote Access & VPN
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 5,604★ 1,288
First released20202015
ReplacesApache Guacamole, TeleportTeleport

Why pick each one

Choose Next Terminal if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 5.6k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Next Terminal details

Choose SSHPiper if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
SSHPiper details

Frequently asked questions

Is Next Terminal or SSHPiper better?

Neither is universally better. Next Terminal has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Next Terminal and SSHPiper free and open-source?

Yes. Next Terminal is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SSHPiper under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Next Terminal and SSHPiper with Docker?

Next Terminal: yes. SSHPiper: yes.

Related comparisons