SRS vs ytdl-sub

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSRSytdl-sub
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageC++Python
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 29,105★ 2,909
First released20252022
ReplacesYouTube Premium

Why pick each one

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Choose ytdl-sub if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.9k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Python
ytdl-sub details

Frequently asked questions

Is SRS or ytdl-sub better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are SRS and ytdl-sub free and open-source?

Yes. SRS is licensed under MIT and ytdl-sub under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SRS and ytdl-sub with Docker?

SRS: yes. ytdl-sub: yes.

Related comparisons