Airsonic-Refix vs SRS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAirsonic-RefixSRS
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageVueC++
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 450★ 29,105
First released20202025
ReplacesSpotify

Why pick each one

Choose Airsonic-Refix if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Vue
Airsonic-Refix details

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Airsonic-Refix or SRS better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community, while Airsonic-Refix is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Airsonic-Refix and SRS free and open-source?

Yes. Airsonic-Refix is licensed under GPL-3.0 and SRS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Airsonic-Refix and SRS with Docker?

Airsonic-Refix: yes. SRS: yes.

Related comparisons