Audinaut vs SRS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAudinautSRS
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageJavaC++
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 134★ 29,105
First released20172025
ReplacesSpotify

Why pick each one

Choose Audinaut if…

  • No ads
  • Lightweight
Audinaut details

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Audinaut or SRS better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community, while Audinaut is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Audinaut and SRS free and open-source?

Yes. Audinaut is licensed under GPL-3.0 and SRS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Audinaut and SRS with Docker?

Audinaut: check the project docs for container support. SRS: yes.

Related comparisons