SRS vs yt-dlp Web UI

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSRSyt-dlp Web UI
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseMITMPL-2.0
LanguageC++Go
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker
GitHub stars★ 29,105★ 2,536
First released20252025
Replaces

Why pick each one

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Choose yt-dlp Web UI if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
yt-dlp Web UI details

Frequently asked questions

Is SRS or yt-dlp Web UI better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are SRS and yt-dlp Web UI free and open-source?

Yes. SRS is licensed under MIT and yt-dlp Web UI under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SRS and yt-dlp Web UI with Docker?

SRS: yes. yt-dlp Web UI: yes.

Related comparisons