SRS vs ydl_api_ng

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSRSydl_api_ng
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageC++Python
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 29,105★ 240
First released20252020
Replaces

Why pick each one

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Choose ydl_api_ng if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Written in Python
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
ydl_api_ng details

Frequently asked questions

Is SRS or ydl_api_ng better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are SRS and ydl_api_ng free and open-source?

Yes. SRS is licensed under MIT and ydl_api_ng under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SRS and ydl_api_ng with Docker?

SRS: yes. ydl_api_ng: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons