SRS vs Yamtrack

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSRSYamtrack
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0-or-later
LanguageC++Python
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB200 MB
Deploymentdockerbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 29,105★ 3,306
First released20252026
ReplacesGoodreads, IMDB, MyAnimeList

Why pick each one

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Choose Yamtrack if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0-or-later license
  • Active community (3.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 200 MB RAM
Yamtrack details

Frequently asked questions

Is SRS or Yamtrack better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are SRS and Yamtrack free and open-source?

Yes. SRS is licensed under MIT and Yamtrack under AGPL-3.0-or-later. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SRS and Yamtrack with Docker?

SRS: yes. Yamtrack: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons