SRS vs xTeVe

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSRSxTeVe
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageC++Go
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 29,105★ 2,257
First released20252018
ReplacesCable TV

Why pick each one

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Choose xTeVe if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.3k GitHub stars)
xTeVe details

Frequently asked questions

Is SRS or xTeVe better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community, while xTeVe is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SRS and xTeVe free and open-source?

Yes. SRS is licensed under MIT and xTeVe under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SRS and xTeVe with Docker?

SRS: yes. xTeVe: yes.

Related comparisons