SRS vs Universal Media Server

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSRSUniversal Media Server
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseMITGPL-2.0
LanguageC++Java
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, bare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 29,105★ 2,636
First released20252012
ReplacesPlex, Serviio

Why pick each one

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Choose Universal Media Server if…

  • Works with old TVs and consoles
  • Simple setup
Universal Media Server details

Frequently asked questions

Is SRS or Universal Media Server better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community, while Universal Media Server is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SRS and Universal Media Server free and open-source?

Yes. SRS is licensed under MIT and Universal Media Server under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SRS and Universal Media Server with Docker?

SRS: yes. Universal Media Server: yes.

Related comparisons