SRS vs Ultrasonic

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSRSUltrasonic
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageC++Kotlin
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdockerbinary, source
GitHub stars★ 29,105★ 500
First released20252019
ReplacesSpotify

Why pick each one

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Choose Ultrasonic if…

  • Stable and mature
  • Privacy respecting
Ultrasonic details

Frequently asked questions

Is SRS or Ultrasonic better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community, while Ultrasonic is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SRS and Ultrasonic free and open-source?

Yes. SRS is licensed under MIT and Ultrasonic under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SRS and Ultrasonic with Docker?

SRS: yes. Ultrasonic: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons