SRS vs Tube

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSRSTube
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageC++
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB50 MB
Deploymentdockerbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 29,105
First released20252023
ReplacesDailymotion, Vimeo, YouTube

Why pick each one

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Choose Tube if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Tube details

Frequently asked questions

Is SRS or Tube better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community, while Tube is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SRS and Tube free and open-source?

Yes. SRS is licensed under MIT and Tube under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SRS and Tube with Docker?

SRS: yes. Tube: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons