SRS vs tinyMediaManager

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSRStinyMediaManager
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageC++Java
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, bare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 29,105★ 8
First released20252012
ReplacesPlex

Why pick each one

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Choose tinyMediaManager if…

  • Excellent organization tools
  • Headless mode available
tinyMediaManager details

Frequently asked questions

Is SRS or tinyMediaManager better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community, while tinyMediaManager is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SRS and tinyMediaManager free and open-source?

Yes. SRS is licensed under MIT and tinyMediaManager under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SRS and tinyMediaManager with Docker?

SRS: yes. tinyMediaManager: yes.

Related comparisons