SRS vs Tempo

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSRSTempo
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageC++Java
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdockerbinary, source
GitHub stars★ 29,105★ 2,220
First released20252022
ReplacesSpotify, Plexamp

Why pick each one

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Choose Tempo if…

  • Modern Android design
  • Works with multiple servers
Tempo details

Frequently asked questions

Is SRS or Tempo better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community, while Tempo is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SRS and Tempo free and open-source?

Yes. SRS is licensed under MIT and Tempo under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SRS and Tempo with Docker?

SRS: yes. Tempo: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons